You built your app with Lovable, Cursor, Bolt, Replit or v0 - and it works. Almost. What's missing is the last mile: security, GDPR, real authentication, a solid database, production deployment, App Store and Play Store approval. That's exactly what I do. With you, not instead of you.
Report + action plan · fixed price announced before the audit · from Brussels, GDPR included
If your app is stuck on the last stretch, you're not an edge case. Vibe coding is gaining ground everywhere - and hitting the same wall everywhere.
the tools know how to build, not finish
By 2028, 40% of new production software will come from vibe coding, according to Gartner (May 2025). Building with AI isn't an amateur shortcut: it's becoming how software gets made.
45% of AI-generated code fails OWASP Top 10 security tests, according to Veracode's GenAI Code Security Report 2025.
62% of AI-produced code contains design flaws or known vulnerabilities, according to the Cloud Security Alliance.
Across 5,600 vibe-coded apps scanned by Escape.tech: over 2,000 vulnerabilities, over 400 exposed secrets (API keys included) and 175 personal data leaks.
And the gate is tightening: in March 2026, Apple blocked updates from vibe-coding platforms (Replit, Vibecode), after App Store submissions jumped 84% in a single quarter.
In short: the tools know how to build, not how to finish. Finishing is still a craft. conveniently, it's mine
Eight problems that show up in almost every vibe-coded app. None of them are your fault - they're what the tools produce by default. All of them can be fixed.
recognized two or three? that's normal
Your OpenAI or Stripe key shipped in the browser bundle, or committed to GitHub. Anyone can copy it and run up your bill.
The login form works, but nothing is checked server-side: routes answer whoever calls them, sessions never expire, the admin panel is one guessed URL away.
Supabase or Firebase on default settings: any user can read - sometimes write - everyone else's data. The access rules were simply never written.
Personal data collected without consent or notice, no export, no deletion - sometimes hosted outside the EU. With European users, that's a real legal risk.
Everything works while everything works. One declined payment, one third-party API down, and the app shows a white screen - or carries on as if nothing happened.
The app lives on the platform's preview URL: no proper domain, no backups, no monitoring, test keys in production.
Apple and Google require what AI doesn't generate on its own: a privacy policy, account deletion, permission handling, compliant metadata. The result: rejection after rejection, often without a clear why.
Thousands of generated lines, duplicated components, stacked patches. Every new prompt fixes one thing and breaks another - and nobody knows where it's safe to touch.
Recognized two or three of these? That's normal. And fixable - often faster than you fear.
A staircase, not a lock-in: each step has its own deliverable, and you decide each time whether we continue.
Twenty-five years of code - agencies, startups, national and international organizations. Most of this job is reading code written by someone else. AI-written code is no exception.
I train future developers to generate code with AI, then to understand and critique it. What I'll do with your app is what I do in class every week.
I've shipped my own apps to the App Store and documented every step of the deployment (EAS, Fastlane). The review that's blocking you today - I've been through it myself. I know what Apple looks at, and what Apple turns down.
Hacked or slow WordPress sites, fixed with a one-day response. Diagnose fast, repair cleanly, hand back the keys - the method doesn't change.
Inside EU law. GDPR isn't a line added at the bottom of the quote: it's my daily framework, built into the audit from day one.
I'm not against vibe coding. I teach it.
Every week, my students generate code with AI, then learn to read it, understand it, critique it. So no - I won't tell you that you built your app the wrong way. You did what most people never do: you turned an idea into something that exists. I just know precisely where these tools stop. That's where my work starts.
No. Starting over is almost always the slowest, most expensive answer - and rarely necessary. I keep what holds, fix what breaks, add what's missing. If something does deserve a rewrite, you'll know at the audit stage, with the reasons why. And you decide.
No again. I read AI-generated code every week: it's my job as a teacher. Its flaws are known and predictable, and none of them will make me roll my eyes. You'll get a diagnosis, not a verdict.
The flash audit has a fixed price, announced before you commit. After that, the quote follows the action plan: you know what, why and how much before saying yes. You can also stop after the audit and run the plan yourself - the report is written for that. Your app already represents weeks of work; the point is making them count.
Yes - I teach with these tools, and I use them. Under the hood, these platforms produce React, Next.js, Supabase, Expo: technologies I've been working with for years.
It's rare. And if it is, you'll know within 48 hours for a fixed price - not after three months of invoices. The audit tells you where you really stand, even when the answer doesn't work in my favor.
Good - that's what the handover is for. You leave with code you understand, short documentation, and sharper reflexes for your next prompts. I'd rather have an autonomous client than a captive one.
It stays that way. Your code is yours, your idea is yours - and if an NDA puts you at ease, we'll sign one, no drama.
Send me the link to your app or your repo, plus two lines on where it's stuck. I'll tell you plainly whether the flash audit can help - and if it can't, I'll tell you that too.
Report + action plan. Your code stays your code.